Discover the key to getting a perfect score on the SAT exam writing section with our “20 Must Know SAT Grammar Rules.” This essential resource is designed to help students master the grammar rules required for a high score on the SAT. With clear explanations, practical examples, and strategic tips, our guide is a must-have for anyone preparing for the SAT or PSAT exam.
Don’t miss your chance to unlock your full potential on the SAT! Invest in your future and purchase our “20 Must Know SAT Grammar Rules” guide today. Say goodbye to confusion and hello to confidence as you learn the crucial grammar rules that will set you apart from the competition.
Order now and take the first step toward achieving your academic goals! Click the link below to secure your copy:
For only $27, Get these Grammar Rules!
Verb tense agreement means that you use the same tense for all the verbs in a clause or sentence.
Example 1:
Incorrect: She was walking to the store and buys some groceries.
Explanation:
The first verb “was walking” is in the past continuous tense, while the second verb “buys” is in the simple present tense. The tenses do not agree.
Fixed: She was walking to the store and bought some groceries.
Explanation:
In the corrected version, both verbs “was walking” and “bought” are in the past tense, showing proper verb tense agreement.
Example 2:
Incorrect: The president met his archrival, Kim Jong Un, and discuss dismantling North Korea’s nuclear weapons.
Explanation:
The verb “met” is in the simple past tense, while “discuss” is in the simple present tense. These two verb tenses do not agree, which causes the sentence to be grammatically incorrect.
Fixed: The president met his archrival, Kim Jong Un, and discussed dismantling North Korea’s nuclear weapons.
Explanation:
The corrected version maintains verb-tense agreement throughout the sentence. Both actions, “met” and “discussed,” are in the simple past tense, which provides a consistent and coherent structure, making the sentence grammatically correct.
Run-on sentences are two independent clauses that are not connected by any punctuation.
Example 1:
Incorrect: The investor’s greed caused him to take unnecessary risk he lost a lot of money.
Explanation:
The first sentence is a run-on sentence because it contains two independent clauses (“The investor’s greed caused him to take unnecessary risk” and “he lost a lot of money”) without proper punctuation or conjunction to separate or connect them. This makes the sentence grammatically incorrect and difficult to read.
Example 2:
Fixed: The investor’s greed caused him to take unnecessary risk, so he lost a lot of money.
Explanation:
The second sentence is correct because it uses a coordinating conjunction “so” along with a comma to properly connect the two independent clauses. This creates a clear relationship between the two clauses and makes the sentence grammatically correct and easier to read.
Example 1:
Incorrect: The manager wanted to reorganize the department, streamline processes, and the workload should be reduced.
Explanation:
The sentence lacks parallelism in the verb forms and structure.
Example 2:
Fixed: The manager wanted to reorganize the department, streamline processes, and reduce the workload.
Explanation:
This sentence has parallel structure with all infinitive verb forms.